This study takes the first step toward creating a verticalscale for WSS using an alternative method, a common-person design.
During the 2010–2011 year, each participating child wasrated on two Developmental Checklists (P3 and P4) ateach of two rating periods. Children who were age 3 at thebeginning of the school year were rated on both checklistsin February and May, and children who started the schoolyear at age 4 were rated on both forms in October andFebruary.
The results of this linking study verified that for a givenchild at a particular point in time, ratings on the WSSP3 Developmental Checklist tend to be higher thanthose on the P4 level. This result was expected becausethe Developmental Guidelines require a higher level ofperformance to obtain a Proficient or In Process rating onP4 than on P3.
When there is a need to track a child’s WSS resultsover a period of time during which both the P3 and P4Developmental Checklists have been completed, the usercan accomplish this by converting the raw scores on oneof the levels to the corresponding raw scores on the otherlevel. Either level may serve as the reference level (the oneto which scores are converted).